Scientific publications

Open-access scientific publications funded by the RESCUE project:


  • Asaadi, A., Schwinger, J., Lee, H., et al. (2024). Carbon cycle feedbacks in an idealized simulation and a scenario simulation of negative emissions in CMIP6 Earth system models. Biogeosciences, 21, 411–435.
  • Ganti, G., Gasser, T., Bui, M. et al. (2024). Evaluating the near- and long-term role of carbon dioxide removal in meeting global climate objectives. Commun Earth Environ 5, 377.
  • Lamb, W.F., Gasser, T., Roman-Cuesta, R.M. et al. (2024). Current national proposals are off track to meet carbon dioxide removal needs. Nat. Clim. Chang.
  • Liu, L., Fisher, R.A., Douville, H. et al. (2024). No constraint on long-term tropical land carbon-climate feedback uncertainties from interannual variability. Commun Earth Environ 5, 348.
  • Minx, J.C., Hilaire, J., Müller-Hansen F. et al. (2024). Coal transitions—part 2: phase-out dynamics in global long-term mitigation scenarios. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 033002.
  • Schwinger, J., Bourgeois, T., and Rickels, W. (2024). On the emission-path dependency of the efficiency of ocean alkalinity enhancement. Environmental Research Letters, 19 (7), 074067.
  • Xiong, Y., Wang, R., Gasser, T. et al. (2024). Potential impacts of pandemics on global warming, agricultural production, and biodiversity loss. One Earth 7, 697-713.


  • Gidden, M.J., Gasser, T., Grassi, G. et al. (2023). Aligning climate scenarios to emissions inventories shifts global benchmarks. Nature 624, 102-108.
  • Kriest, I., Getzlaff, J., Landolfi, A., et al. (2023). Exploring the role of different data types and timescales in the quality of marine biogeochemical model calibration. Biogeosciences, 20, 2645-2669.
  • Krebs-Kanzow, U., Rodehacke, C. B., and Lohmann, G. (2023). Brief communication: Surface energy balance differences over Greenland between ERA5 and ERA-Interim. The Cryosphere, 17, 5131–5136.
  • Liu, L., Ciais, P., Wu, M. et al. (2023). Increasingly negative tropical water–interannual CO2 growth rate coupling. Nature 618, 755–760.
  • Melnikova, I., Ciais, P., Boucher, O. et al. (2023). Assessing carbon cycle projections from complex and simple models under SSP scenarios. Climatic Change 176, 168.
  • Merfort, L., Bauer, N., Humpenöder, F. et al. (2023). State of global land regulation inadequate to control biofuel land-use-change emissions. Nat. Clim. Chang.
  • Meyer, A.L.S., and Trisos, C.H. (2023). Ecological impacts of temperature overshoot: The journey and the destination. One Earth, 6(12), 1614-1617.
  • Powis C.M., Smith S.M., Minx J.C., and Gasser T. (2023). Quantifying global carbon dioxide removal deployment. Environ. Res. Lett., 18, 024022.
  • Sauerland, V., von Hallern, C., Kriest, I., and Getzlaff, J. (2023). A CMA-ES algorithm allowing for random parameters in model calibration. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 15, e2022MS003390.


  • Padrón, R. S., Gudmundsson, L., Liu, L., et al (2022). Drivers of intermodel uncertainty in land carbon sink projections. Biogeosciences, 19, 5435-5448.