Scientific publications

Open-access scientific publications funded by the RESCUE project:

2025

  • Gaucher Y., Tanaka, K., Johansson, D.J.A., et al. (2025). Potential and costs required for methane removal to compete with BECCS as a mitigation option. Environ. Res. Lett. 20, 024034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ada813 
  • Melnikova, I., Ciais, P., Tanaka, K., et al. (2025). Carbon cycle and climate feedbacks under CO2 and non-CO2 overshoot pathways. Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 257–273. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-257-2025
  • Roldán-Gómez, P. J., De Luca, P., Bernardello, R., and Donat, M. G. (2025). Regional irreversibility of mean and extreme surface air temperature and precipitation in CMIP6 overshoot scenarios associated with interhemispheric temperature asymmetries. Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1-2025
  • Zhou, J., Li, W., Ciais, P. et al. (2025). Contributions of countries without a carbon neutrality target to limit global warming. Nat Commun 16, 468. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55720-x

2024

  • Asaadi, A., Schwinger, J., Lee, H., et al. (2024). Carbon cycle feedbacks in an idealized simulation and a scenario simulation of negative emissions in CMIP6 Earth system models. Biogeosciences, 21, 411–435. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-411-2024
  • Ganti, G., Gasser, T., Bui, M. et al. (2024). Evaluating the near- and long-term role of carbon dioxide removal in meeting global climate objectives. Commun Earth Environ 5, 377. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01527-z
  • Jäger, F., Schwaab, J., Quilcaille, Y., el al. (2024). Fire weather compromises forestation-reliant climate mitigation pathways. Earth Syst. Dynam. 15, 1055–1071. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1055-2024
  • Lamb, W.F., Gasser, T., Roman-Cuesta, R.M. et al. (2024). Current national proposals are off track to meet carbon dioxide removal needs. Nat. Clim. Chang. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-01993-5
  • Liu, L., Fisher, R.A., Douville, H. et al. (2024). No constraint on long-term tropical land carbon-climate feedback uncertainties from interannual variability. Commun Earth Environ 5, 348. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01504-6
  • Meyer, A.S., Pigot, A.L., Merow, C., et al. (2024). Temporal dynamics of climate change exposure and opportunities for global marine biodiversity. Nat Commun 15, 5836.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49736-6 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49736-6
  • Minx, J.C., Hilaire, J., Müller-Hansen F. et al. (2024). Coal transitions—part 2: phase-out dynamics in global long-term mitigation scenarios. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 033002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad24cd
  • Sanderson, B. M., Booth, B. B. B., Dunne, J., et al. (2024). The need for carbon-emissions-driven climate projections in CMIP7. Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8141–8172. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8141-2024
  • Schwinger, J., Bourgeois, T., and Rickels, W. (2024). On the emission-path dependency of the efficiency of ocean alkalinity enhancement. Environmental Research Letters 19 (7), 074067. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad5a27
  • Xiong, Y., Wang, R., Gasser, T. et al. (2024). Potential impacts of pandemics on global warming, agricultural production, and biodiversity loss. One Earth 7, 697-713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.02.012
  • He, Y., Piao, S., Ciais, P., Xu, H., and Gasser, T. (2024). Future land carbon removals in China consistent with national inventory. Nature Communications, 15(1), 10426. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54846-2

2023

  • Gidden, M.J., Gasser, T., Grassi, G. et al. (2023). Aligning climate scenarios to emissions inventories shifts global benchmarks. Nature 624, 102-108. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06724-y
  • Kriest, I., Getzlaff, J., Landolfi, A., et al. (2023). Exploring the role of different data types and timescales in the quality of marine biogeochemical model calibration. Biogeosciences, 20, 2645-2669. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2645-2023
  • Krebs-Kanzow, U., Rodehacke, C. B., and Lohmann, G. (2023). Brief communication: Surface energy balance differences over Greenland between ERA5 and ERA-Interim. The Cryosphere, 17, 5131–5136.https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5131-2023 https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5131-2023
  • Liu, L., Ciais, P., Wu, M. et al. (2023). Increasingly negative tropical water–interannual CO2 growth rate coupling. Nature 618, 755–760. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06056-x
  • Melnikova, I., Ciais, P., Boucher, O. et al. (2023). Assessing carbon cycle projections from complex and simple models under SSP scenarios. Climatic Change 176, 168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03639-5
  • Merfort, L., Bauer, N., Humpenöder, F. et al. (2023). State of global land regulation inadequate to control biofuel land-use-change emissions. Nat. Clim. Chang. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01711-7
  • Meyer, A.L.S., and Trisos, C.H. (2023). Ecological impacts of temperature overshoot: The journey and the destination. One Earth, 6(12), 1614-1617.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.11.014
  • Powis C.M., Smith S.M., Minx J.C., and Gasser T. (2023). Quantifying global carbon dioxide removal deployment. Environ. Res. Lett., 18, 024022.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acb450
  • Sauerland, V., von Hallern, C., Kriest, I., and Getzlaff, J. (2023). A CMA-ES algorithm allowing for random parameters in model calibration. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 15, e2022MS003390. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003390

2022

  • Padrón, R. S., Gudmundsson, L., Liu, L., et al (2022). Drivers of intermodel uncertainty in land carbon sink projections. Biogeosciences, 19, 5435-5448. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5435-2022